User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3.
Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. It appears your browser does not have it turned on. Please see your browser settings for this feature. And when you rip it off for your own video, it is not going to sound the same unless you use a lossless audio codec when rendering your video.
For the record, mp4 doesn't support any lossless audio codecs so as long as you use mp4, the quality gets worse for sure. And when you upload your video and the audio gets re-encoded by the streaming service, the quality gets worse again. I think Iwara doesn't do that for the "Source" quality as long as your file meets the requirements, but YouTube certainly does.
I cant tell a difference and my videos doesnt ment to be still avaible in for the future D;. That's not true either. Yes, that video will sound the same in 20 years wtf are you even talking about. But if I downloaded that video, re-encoded it and uploaded it again today, it would sound even shittier than it already does.
If you don't care that your videos sound horrible, then that's your problem and I'm not particularly interested in convincing you to start caring about it. But stop giving people advice when you don't have any idea what you're talking about.
I'm not a speaker salesman, As I said, I can use the standard Samsung earphones and your video still sounds like shit on those. A 5 MB mp3 is fine as long as the song is no longer than and it's being encoded directly into mp3 from the lossless source material. If you're encoding it from an mp3 that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from a high quality mp3 that was encoded from the original CD quality file a very realistic scenario , it'll end up sounding like your video.
Earphones, not speakers. I can't hear it on a smart phone speaker, but I sure can hear it on the earphones that come with one. The degradation of sound quality in your video is just as obvious with those as it is with the Samsung earphones. Guthix i have aknowledged awaclus "point" allrdy in my first reply, the following conversation was more about how much quality lose is tolerated.
Noted that I could not download the original song release from NicoNico at that time, because of a NicoNico update that my video grabbers had not yet had been updated to. SPEK is pure gold for deciding the best possible sound source file. Then I'll slide the new soundtrack in place, adjusting in 0. I never make an upload public at any video site, without checking its private download with SPEK first.
Your softwares might reduce the sound quality when you least expect it, and SPEK will helpfully reveal it. Appearantly the song creator did a non-optimal NicoNico upload of the song, and the motion creator later on got the original soundtrack by E-mail from the song creator? Where to download WAV files? Mister Orzo. WAV files containing what? Voices, music, sound effects? Ley Line Walker.
Cosmic Owltron. Then use Audacity to convert the desired songs into. I am useing the freeware Free Youtube mp3 converter to take sound from a video. Quote: convert it intentionally from a 24 bit Quote: for example this high quality track. Quote: In this case i can only say trust your ears, if a sound file sounds good than the same "quality" is what you get when you rip it off for your own video. Quote: theoretically files lose quality but in practise its so little.
Quote: the sound in this video is a copy of a copy. Quote: im quiet sure it will still work the same way in 20 years. Quote: No, it sounds like shit in practice [
0コメント